|
Egypt Today, Egypt
July 11 2006
Sona Zeitlian
Renowned Armenian-Egyptian author Sona
Zeitlian examines the
centuries-old relationship between Armenians
and their adopted
Egyptian homeland
By David Lee Wilson
UNTIL THE FALL of the Soviet Union and the
establishment of the modern Republic of Armenia,
the Armenian people had been without a homeland
for centuries. Between war, migration, deportation
and genocidal massacres, the majority of the
native Armenian population was forced to find
settlement away from its homeland.
Egypt took the lead among nations that gave
Armenians in exile a home. Here, Armenians
were allowed to retain their cultural identity,
given the opportunity to obtain citizenship
and encouraged to contribute to every aspect
of Egyptian society, including its political
and military establishments.
The relationship between the Armenian diaspora
and what became their adopted home has been
put into focus with the publication of Armenians
in Egypt: Contribution of Armenians to Medieval
and Modern
Egypt by renowned Armenian-Egyptian author
Sona Zeitlian.
Zeitlian, now in her 70s, was born, raised
and educated in Egypt. A teacher in Cairo
for many years, she writes passionately about
her ancestors' contribution to her birth country.
Filled with photographs and illustrations
and wonderfully annotated Armenians in Egypt
explores the achievements and accomplishments
of artisans, politicos and pashas of Armenian
descent who helped weave the complex tapestry
that is modern Egypt.
While Zeitlian was in Cairo for a series
of lectures connected to the
English edition of the book, I sat with her
for an exclusive interview. Excerpts:
Egypt Today: By all accounts you have had
a very successful return to Egypt; how long
has it been?
Sona Zeitlian: It was twenty years ago that
I was last here.
Unfortunately, that trip was cut short because
my home at the time was in Lebanon and it
was a time of civil war. I got the news that
my husband had been kidnapped [he was later
killed by his captors and his corpse found
by the side of a Beirut street; no group has
ever claimed responsibility for the slaying]
and it was a whole new set of realities that
had confronted me. Thankfully, my feelings
then were completely different from those
I am experiencing. I am here to celebrate
the Armenian-Egyptian experience, which means
so much to me.
What's the biggest change in Egypt you've
noticed since returning?
I made it a point to visit both Islamic Cairo
and Coptic Cairo to get both perspectives
of the city, and so much has changed. There's
demographics, obviously: There are so many
people and so much traffic, but those are
only the things that you see immediately.
On the other hand, there is much progress
on the economic and political fronts. The
Middle East is a turbulent place, and so what
attacks one country will automatically attack
the others. The Palestinian problem has been
with us for so long and has affected our destiny
in the Arab world, and we all feel the repercussions
of that everywhere that we go.
The turbulence continues, especially with
the situation in Iraq. The problems really
haven't changed. They are problems that have
been with us for decades now and I feel strongly
the urge to find justice.
For me it is more urgent than the search
for democracy. Of course democracy is essential,
but the feeling from the common people is
that they have to find justice finally.
Unless justice is granted to the people,
I don't think that there will be good grounds
to build democracy.
Most Armenians have never been to their ancestral
homeland, but they speak with an incredible
passion on the subject. To what would you
credit that?
There are two very important things about
Armenian life that make us so passionate and
make us seek the justice that has been denied
us.
First there's the genocide. It was covered
up; the powerful nations of the time, for
their own political interests, accommodated
it. They would say, it has to be proven and
so on. Of course there are many people who
have learned the truth about the genocide,
but political interests prevail.
Statesmen have to take relations between
countries and strategic situations into account
and that is understandable but there is still
an urge in us Armenians to find justice. Ninety
years have passed, but we have two things
that have sustained us, and the first is our
church. Our church is not an international
church. It is a church only for Armenians,
a national church. The destiny of the church
has been tied to that of the people. I mean,
the Armenian church developed in the fifth
century. We have had this national church,
and even when we had no kings or nobility,
it took care of the people.
The second thing we have going for us is
our high regard for our culture. We had the
alphabet very early on in the fifth century
and this year we celebrate the 1,600th anniversary
of the Armenian alphabet. The culture was
nourished by intellectuals all of those years
in the schools. Those schools, both national
and private, fostered this. For instance,
in Egypt, we had 30 schools up until the 1960s,
when the community started to disperse. We
had 30 private and public (when I say public
I mean community schools) so there was great
emphasis on education.
These important factors stressed our ethnic
identity and made us passionate about what
each of us can contribute to the Armenian
people.
The ultimate support of any individual is
the family, and they know that no matter what,
they have a safe haven and open arms to receive
them. So family has also sustained us.
Ultimately, my book is about setting the
record straight in two ways:
First, it's about everything the Armenians
have contributed to Egypt.
Second, it's about everything Egypt has done
for the Armenian immigrants who came here
with nothing, but were given the opportunity
to make a life for themselves.
The implementation of justice, it seems to
me, is very much dependent on who your publicist
is. How is it that the world believes the
genocides carried out against the Jews of
Europe and the aboriginal people of the Americas,
yet the Armenian experience flies below the
radar even though estimates claim anywhere
from 650,000 to 1.5 million Armenians were
massacred between 1915 and 1918?
You know, that's a very important question.
The first act of the genocide was to wipe
out the intellectuals. They were the head
to chop off, so as to make the body unable
to defend itself and ultimately to disappear.
It was very well planned from their perspective
and we lost the cream of the Armenian society.
Two generations passed before we were able
to regain a foothold.
Even now, we are not very good at public
relations. Maybe it is the residual effect
of the genocide: the fear of what might happen
if you raise your head and raise your voice.
Maybe. But I think that the time has come
that we should think about other strategies.
For example, in Sohag in Upper Egypt, there
is an old Armenian monastery called the White
Monastery. At one time it belonged to the
Armenians, and there are inscriptions that
mark the dates when the Armenians were there
and what they had achieved. Later on, as the
Islamic population increased, there was a
move of Armenians toward the Delta, Cairo
and so on, and when there were no more Armenians
in Sohag, the monastery passed to the Copts.
It is now an important place of pilgrimage
for the Copts. A few years ago, under the
previous ambassador, the previous patriarch,
the Copts said, We are going to whitewash
the walls inside, and if you like, we can
give you permission to remove these inscriptions
and take them to your own churches or do whatever
you want.
There was a lot of discussion about this,
and ultimately the patriarch of the Armenian
Church decided that it was better to keep
our heads down. It is the same state of mind
that I was referring to earlier. Why not say,
Thank you for returning this to us! and take
advantage of the situation?
We didn't do that and we should have.
What was it that enabled the Armenians to
weave themselves into Egyptian culture?
The very early Armenians that came here came
to study at the great institutions, the Alexandria
Library and so forth. This was in the third
and fourth centuries, and they came to study
at the Hellenic institutions that had a worldwide
reputation. Other Armenians came for trade
opportunities, because there had been long-established
Armenian trade networks on the caravan routes
in Anatolia and Mesopotamia. They also supplied
and trained troops you would call them mercenaries
to defend the caravan routes.
There was a third category of Armenians,
and those were slaves. When the amir freed
his slaves, those slaves, according to their
abilities, often became generals. The person
who led the Fatimid army and who was the initiator
of building a new capital was of Armenian
descent. He was a former slave, a Muslim and
also the founder of Cairo. Surprisingly enough,
Al-Azhar University though it was not a university
at the time, but still a place of higher education
from that time until today they still remember
his name, Gohar. He was called, Gohar the
Sicilian, because he was imported as a slave
to Tunisia from Sicily. That was another category,
former slaves who had attained important positions
in the Army: in the administrations and especially
as calligraphers or secretaries. If you were
a good calligrapher, you had a position in
the administration.
The first Armenian who was instrumental in
founding the Holy Armenian See, the future
patriarchate, was also a former slave who
was also the governor of Syria. When the Fatimid
dynasty was in poor shape, this former slave
was already known as a very courageous man,
so they asked him to become vizier in Cairo.
He made one condition for this; he said, I
will bring my Armenian army with me. Because
of their dire straights they replied, Whatever
you want, just bring peace to this country.
It is estimated that there were 10,000 Armenian
soldiers that accompanied him. This was Badr
al-Gamali.
During his time, he never forgot that he
was an Armenian. He was a Muslim, of course,
and he was also not only a vizier, or what
we would call a prime minister today; he was
also the leader of the army and the chief
of the propaganda apparatus. He monopolized
all three posts, so he was really a dictator
if we used the modern term. He was very good
to Armenians, and the time that he was vizier
here corresponds to the time of the fall of
the Armenian kingdom in our native land.
Because of the benevolent attitude towards
Armenians in Egypt, many Armenians came here,
and he gave them free housing and encouraged
the establishment of the Holy See.
The acceptance of Armenians in Egypt wasn't
the norm, was it?
There was a huge difference in Egypt. Armenians
here gave a lot of money and material help
in 1896 and 1915 to the Armenian casualties
and the refugee camps in Syria and so many
other places. The Egyptian government accepted
the transfer of so much money out of Egypt
for humanitarian reasons. They could have
objected and said that no Egyptian money could
leave the country, but they allowed it. So,
we have much to be grateful for to this country.
One hears of sporadic tensions between Copts
and Muslims in Egypt. Is there a similar tension
between Armenians and Muslims?
I wouldn't say that. You know, when the revolution
took place, one of the important slogans was
Egypt for Egyptians. Now, Armenians were by
this time Egyptian and there was a difference
between Armenians and Greeks or Italians or
other foreign minorities in the sense that
there had been special dispensations for foreigners.
It was an Ottoman arrangement that they made
to encourage the Europeans to invest in Egypt.
Europeans were free from the regulations and
the laws of the country. They only followed
the laws of their own country, and if anything
happened ~W from a misdemeanor to manslaughter
they were judged only in their consulate courts
and not by the government of Egypt.
Armenians did not have this status since
they had no independent country of their own.
In fact, there was only an Armenian embassy
in Cairo after the fall of the Soviet Union,
when the Armenian Republic was established
just 15 years ago.
I will give you an example. I taught at Kalousdian
School in Boulaq.
There was a very rich Armenian who had a
monopoly on hammams, or public baths. He was
also very prominent in the maritime trade
on the Nile. He was a very wealthy man, but
he had no children, so he gave all of his
money to that school, and it bears his name
because of that. There was a rule that even
though you leave your money to a specific
school, the money goes to the Ministry of
Education, and it is the ministry that determines
if they will give the money to the school
or not. It depends on their agenda.
Our patriarch wrote the prime minister at
the time and said, Do you want this school
to be closed, where so many Armenian children
are being educated, most of them free of charge?
Do you want us to lose this school? If you
care for the Armenians, you must do your utmost
for us to retain this school.
Mubarak Pasha Baya, a very prominent Armenian
who was the prime minister, found the loopholes
to approach the problem through. The result
was that he was able to keep the school for
the Armenians and in court it was registered
in the name of the community.
Last year they celebrated their 150th anniversary.
So, you see, this is an example that without
having a government or an embassy to support
you, and only thanks to that high official,
the rights of the Armenian people were taken
care of.
So is Egypt still an attractive home for
Armenians?
The political situation has changed. You
know what struck the
Armenian community in Egypt hard was Nasser's
nationalization policy.
My father was a tobacco distributor in Old
Cairo and one day when he went to his place
of work, it was closed with red tape and he
was told, Now this belongs to the government.
They said that maybe if he waited 15 or 20
years, that gradually the government would
return what it took ~W and of course that
never happened. The Armenian community was
really a wealthy community, many involved
in both light and heavy industry, and that
blow was very hard. In just one night, you
went back to your work and it was no longer
yours.
At the same time there was a welcoming cry
from countries like Australia and Canada.
They opened wide their doors and said, If
you want to leave, we are ready to welcome
you. If those doors had not opened as wide
or they were not so welcoming, not so many
Armenians would have left I am sure.
Of course much has changed now from the policies
of that time, but It's a shame: One of our
foremost filmmakers, Atom Egoyan, was born
in Egypt and his father was a classmate of
mine. He was born here, and when the revolution
came he was five years old and his family
immigrated to Canada. Now he is a famous film
director and producer, and if he had stayed
here that talent would have gone to Egypt.
Have you been able to get a feel for the
current Armenian-Egyptian experience? And
what has been the general reaction to the
book in Egypt thus far?
There were many Armenians who came to me
and told me that they did not know so much
about their culture and history in Egypt even
though they have lived here all of their lives.
What impressed them most was that there was
an uninterrupted Armenian presence here.
Today, we have a very good ambassador to
Egypt, and he has taken good care of the community.
There was an initial printing of the book
that appeared in 2004 and at the time he was
newly appointed as ambassador to Egypt, and
one of the friends of my daughter who knew
him in Armenia gave him the book. She thought
that it would give him an idea of the history
of Armenians in Egypt.
Apparently, he liked the book, and when we
started working on the expanded English edition,
he asked to write the forward and he wanted
to present the book in Cairo where the story
began. From what I saw at the launch party
yesterday, it was well received by the Egyptian
dignitaries and the other ambassadors. If
you present them facts and not just speeches,
and you accept in all humility what this country
has done for the Armenian community, it will
always be well received.
http://www.egypttoday.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=6844
|